Kalgoorlie Miner 10 October 1906, page 2
Alleged Seduction
The Kanowna Case – Serious Charges against a Married Man
Frances ‘Frank’ Fordham BROWNE (Plaintiff)-v- John Lewis Henry MARTIN (Defendant)
The hearing of the civil case of Frank Fordham Browne against John Lewis Martin, in which the plaintiff claims £1000 for the alleged seduction of his step-daughter, Hermione Cynisca SMITH, was continued in the Kalgoorlie civil court yesterday morning before the Chief Justice Parker and the following jury of 12— Harold Church (foreman), D. J. Carmichael, J. Creedon, Alexander Foote, C.A. Degenhardt, J. J. Dwyer, C. J. Gunter, A. H. Greenwood, S. Beston,
D. Fienberg, J. H. Coatham, and Joseph Evans. Mr. Keenan and Mr. Cooke represented the plaintiff, and Mr. V. F. Smith and Mr. Norris appeared for the defendant.
Statement of Claim – The plaintiff is an engine driver residing at Kanowna, and the defendant is a gold-mining battery owner residing in Kanowna. Hermione Cynisca Smith is the stepdaughter of the plaintiff, and at the time mentioned, assisted him in the management of his household affairs. On or about August 1904, the defendant seduced Hermione Cynisca Smith, whereby she became pregnant with a child, and was delivered on May 5 1905. In consequence of the said seduction, the plaintiff was deprived of the services of the said Hermione Cynisca Smith for a long time, and incurred expense in nursing and taking care of her and for the delivery of the child.
Particulars of expenses: — Medical attendance, £3 3s, medical comforts £1, conveyance to Kalgoorlie £1, nursing £5, total, £10 3s. The plaintiff claims £1000.
Further particulars said – The first alleged act of intercourse between the defendant and Hermione Cynisca Smith occurred in January 1904, about 9 o’clock at night in the plaintiff’s house in Kanowna. The subsequent alleged acts of intercourse occurred once in February, 1904, shortly after 6 o’clock in the evening at plaintiffs house also at the beginning of March, 1904, at about 1 o’clock in the afternoon, at plaintiff’s house; also once in May,1904, and once in June,1904, on both occasions between 8p.m. and 9 p.m., outside the recreation reserve, Kanowna; also Friday, July 22, 1904, between 11.30 o’clock and 12 o’clock at night, near the Fitzroy Lead, Kanowna: also once at about the beginning of August, 1904, and once about the end of August, 1904, on both occasions between 8 and 9 p.m., outside the recreation reserve, Kanowna, and the last occasion about the beginning of September, 1904, at about 8 o’clock in the evening, outside the recreation reserve.
The birth took place about 7 o’clock on the evening of May 5, 1905, at the plaintiff’s residence in Kanowna, in the presence of the plaintiff’s wife and her sister, Mrs. Flexmore Guncliffe. There was no medical attendant or midwife present.
Statement of Defence — The said Hermione Cynisca Smith did not assist the plaintiff in the management of his household affairs. The defendant did not seduce the said Hermione Cynisca Smith in or about August, 1904, or at any other time, whereby she became pregnant with child, and was delivered thereof on May 5, 1905. The plaintiff was not deprived of the services of the said Hermione Cynisca Smith, and did not suffer any alleged damage. The plaintiff did not become pregnant, nor was she delivered of a child as alleged.
Evidence for the Defence
John Lewis Martin stated that in January 1904, he was in Bunbury with his wife and arrived on Sunday, July 24th at Kanowna, in connection with the sale of the Q.E.D. mining lease. He arrived at 1 o’clock, and Stewart and Browne met him. Browne was not on the afternoon shift that week. He would be on the afternoon shift the following week. He arranged to have his meals at the plaintiff’s house and commenced to do so on the next Monday morning. Breakfast lasted about 20 minutes, after which he went straight to the battery. Dinner lasted about 20 minutes, and he then went to his own house. He stated the following –
He did not pull the girl into her mother’s bedroom for a certain purpose
He had never been in the house after tea.
The young sister, Helen, was always there.
He had not been there when the sister was in bed.
He had not at any time misconducted himself with the girl.
The house was made of hessian, and anyone who called out would be heard in any part of it. The witness denied the other allegations. He had never walked out with the plaintiff’s step-daughter in Kanowna. The statement that he met the girl after she came to see his wife one evening was not true. He went to the bazaar on the second night. Voting for the most popular woman was going on. Witness gave Mrs. Browne or Mrs. Conliffe £2 for votes for Hermie Smith.
Nobody offered to return him £1, as stated by the plaintiff’s side. He stayed for 10 minutes or a quarter of an hour. Mrs. Browne suggested that there might be some trouble through jealousy because Hermie Smith won. He told Mrs. Browne that if he were there, he would see that she did not get into trouble. He did not offer to take her home. He left a few minutes after 11 o’clock and met Mr Beech going into O’Brien’s Hotel. They stayed there for ten minutes and then went to Wyatt’s Hotel, in the direction of his battery. They went in and had a drink and came out about ten minutes later. They walked to the corner of the recreation reserve, at the junction of Larkin and Mercer streets. Mr. Beech went home down Mercer Street, and the witness went along Larkin Street to the battery, where he arrived about 11.45 pm.
He met McMartin on the battery. The battery stopped after he had been there for five minutes. Gardner, one of the night shift, had arrived, but Browne had not arrived. Witness was there till 12 midnight, and left with Martin. Witness camp was 23 yards from the battery, and he went to bed. Martin went home. Witness did not leave his camp that night. Browne had not arrived when he left. Up to the time he went to sleep, Brown had not arrived. Browne used to come on a bicycle. He saw Dr. Barber in July and August. At that time his health was bad, and it remained so till October, when he had to go to the hospital, and then to the Eastern States, whence he returned about January 1905.
Up to the time of the girl’s confinement, she never suggested that he was the father of the child. He met Mrs. Browne and Mrs. Conliffe in April, and there was then no suggestion. On July 4, 1905, he was outside the courthouse at Kanowna. Plaintiff said to him, “What about this case?” Witness said he did not know anything about it. The witness asked him what he wanted. Plaintiff said that he only wanted his expenses, and that he would bring the girl back to Kanowna. Witness said, ‘I’ll pay nothing; I don’t know anything about it.’ Plaintiff said, ‘I don’t believe you had anything to do with the girl myself. We have always been friends, why not be friends now?’
A man named Fitzpatrick was standing five yards away. From June 25 to August 3 he was in Kalgoorlie three times a week. Connell’s camp had two rooms. On October 24, 1904, in consequence of Browne coming to work in a drunk state, the witness dismissed him from his service. To Mr. Keenan: If it appeared on the judge’s notes that he went to the bazaar on the three nights, it was wrong. He said at the last trial that he would see that the girl was not interfered with if he were there. He was sure that he did not say he would see her home, and also that Mrs. Browne did not thank him for his offer and say that it would be too much trouble for him. He said he had never addressed the girl as ”Hermie. He had never had his meals alone with the girl, and had never been out alone with her. He did not speak to her on the second night of the bazaar.
James Andrew Fitzpatrick stated that he was outside the Kanowna Warden’s Court on July 4, 1905. He saw Browne and Martin there, and heard a conversation between them, he was 15 ft away. Browne said he did not think Martin had had anything to do with the girl. He also said, ‘I don’t want to ruin you, but if you will pay the expenses, I will bring the girl back. Martin said he would not pay, as he did not know anything about it. He had seen Hermie Smith out with Wright, Weller, George Cornell and Roberts till as late as 7.30 p.m, and later in the Kanowna streets.
Dr. Barber gave evidence to the effect that the defendant was in such a condition, while under his care at the period in question, that he did not think he would have any sexual desire, although he admitted a possibility of it if he drank liquor. Lilian Marian Martin, wife of the defendant, said that it was not true that in August or September Hermie Smith came to her house with messages. She only came once at night, and that was with her aunt, Mrs. Conliffe. It was the night before the Kanowna races, about 7.30, when she brought a hat for the witness to wear at the races. She. went away with her aunt. At that time, her husband was not well. During August, he did not go out at night at all.
Henry Randolph Beech deposed that on the second night of the bazaar he went into the hall for a minute or two at about 9.30 p.m. He went back to his office, and left finally about 11 o’clock. He went to the White Feather (O’Brien’s) Hotel, and recognised the voice of the defendant when he was entering the side door. They went in together, and each had a drink. They left after about ten minutes. They walked along Larkin Street, and at the Federal Hotel they each had another drink, after which they went out, the witness went home, and Martin went in the direction of his battery.
On July 4th the witness met Browne and asked him why he had picked on Jack. Martin, and added that he had been a good friend to him until he (Browne) got too much drink. Browne replied that he should not have sacked him, and that
when a man did him a bad turn, he always wanted to get even with him.
He also said that the girl had not had a child. Browne was then under the influence of liquor and fell over when he endeavoured to pick up some money that he had dropped.
A total of nineteen persons were called for the defence, contradicting the plaintiff’s evidence on material points. They were men who were totally disinterested in the case, and whom it was madness to suggest would go into the box and run the risk of seven years penal servitude for perjury to assist the case for Browne. However, damages of £200 were awarded to the Plaintiff, which was appealed and upheld. However, a second appeal was heard and the case was won by the defendant. The whole proceedings took over a year to complete.
NOTES:
Frank Fordham BROWNE had married Hermione’s mother, Ellen Smith, in Victoria in 1898; she had been widowed in 1893. Frank Fordham Browne died in 1921 and is buried in the Kalgoorlie Cemetery.
Hermione Cynisca SMITH was the daughter of Charles Robert Iredale SMITH and Ellen SLY and was born in 1887 in Footscray, Victoria. Hermione did give birth to an illegitimate child in Kanowna in 1905 when she was 18 years old. He was John Louis Martin SMITH. Hermione SMITH went on to marry Alexanda JOHNSTON in Boulder in 1911, to whom she had two sons, William and Allen. She died in Cheltenham, Victoria, in 1965.
John Lewis Henry MARTIN married Leila Marion WALLACE in Kanowna in 1900. They had two children, John and Minnie, both born in Kanowna.
1. Was Hermione’s stepfather just trying to make some money from his stepdaughter’s illegitimate pregnancy, or just to exact revenge for being sacked?
2. Was the baby really John Louis Henry MARTIN’s? The baby’s name was ‘John Louis Martin SMITH’, which would seem to indicate it may have been. What do you think?
3. It’s not known what became of John Louis Martin SMITH.
Leave a Tip!
If you would like to support my work sharing stories of the Western Australian Goldfields, a small tip – starting at just $2 – would mean a great deal. You're welcome to give more if you feel inclined.
Every contribution, no matter the amount, helps me continue researching and preserving these important stories for future generations. Your generosity supports the ongoing costs of running the website. Thank you so much.
Visit our Why Donate page for more information and to make a donation.
Leave a Reply